Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-1-11
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of this study was to compare two methods of semen preparation: multiple tube swim-up and Percoll separation, using a randomized cross-over clinical study, in which sperm parameters, oocyte fertilization rates, embryo quality and cell stage were analysed. Overall, there was no difference between the two preparation methods in the normozoospermic cycles. In the male-factor cycles, Percoll extracted a higher total number of spermatozoa (P = 0.02), increased the concentration of motile spermatozoa (P = 0.02), increased the total number of motile spermatozoa per sample (P = 0.02), and enhanced the recovery rate of motile spermatozoa (P = 0.04) compared to swim-up. There was a significant improvement in fertilization rates (P = 0.0006), in the percentage of embryos over 2-cell stage on day of transfer (P = 0.004), and in the number of replaced embryos per transfer (P = 0.01) in the Percoll as compared to swim-up cycles. There was no significant difference in embryo quality. We conclude, therefore, that in advanced reproductive procedures where sperm dysfunction exists, semen preparation with Percoll should replace the swim-up technique.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0268-1161
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
8
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1438-42
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1993
pubmed:articleTitle
Percoll semen preparation enhances human oocyte fertilization in male-factor infertility as shown by a randomized cross-over study.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial