Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1993-4-29
pubmed:abstractText
The validity of routine ultrasonography (US) in the evaluation of patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) was investigated in a prospective study. From April 1989 to April 1990, 140 patients with suspected BAT were included in this study. Ultrasonography was performed by 17 surgeons using a standardized technique. The influence of the investigators' experience in US was manifested in the positive predictive value (PPV). Surgeons with a learning period of less than 1 year had a PPV of 60%. Investigators with experience of more than 1 year but less than 3 years had a PPV of 76%. For the most experienced investigators (> 3 years) a PPV of 92% was recorded. The sensitivity for intra-abdominal lesions was 100%, 100%, and 92%, and the specificity 94%, 89%, and 98% for the three levels of experience, respectively. We conclude that US is a suitable test for screening patients with BAT since it is highly sensitive, highly specific, complication free, and easy to learn. The positive findings of surgeons who are learning to use this method should be verified by reinvestigation by an experienced sonographer, by diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), or by a CT scan if the patient is hemodynamically stable.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0022-5282
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
34
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
264-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1993
pubmed:articleTitle
Ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma: influence of the investigators' experience.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of General Surgery, Phillips-University Marburg, Federal Republic of Germany.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article