rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0008976,
umls-concept:C0023693,
umls-concept:C0034656,
umls-concept:C0150108,
umls-concept:C0220825,
umls-concept:C0392258,
umls-concept:C0522510,
umls-concept:C0871261,
umls-concept:C1123023,
umls-concept:C1704632,
umls-concept:C1706817,
umls-concept:C1947910,
umls-concept:C2911692
|
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-6-24
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In a randomized controlled split-face trial to evaluate efficacy and adverse effects from rejuvenation with long-pulsed dye laser (LPDL) versus intense pulsed light (IPL).
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
pubmed:issn |
0196-8092
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
40
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
293-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2008-12-19
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Face,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Lasers, Dye,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Pain, Postoperative,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Patient Satisfaction,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Phototherapy,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Pigmentation Disorders,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Skin Aging,
pubmed-meshheading:18563775-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|