Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-4-11
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to compare the dentoskeletal effects of a conventional and a modified Twin-block (TB) appliance. The conventional TB appliance was constructed with a large, single-step advancement. The modified appliance, termed the mini-block (MB), was incrementally advanced, incorporated a maxillary incisor torquing spring, and had a reduced bite-block height.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0889-5406
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
127
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
465-72; quiz 517
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Adolescent, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Cephalometry, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Child, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Facial Bones, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Female, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Male, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Malocclusion, Angle Class II, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Mandibular Advancement, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Maxillofacial Development, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Orthodontic Appliance Design, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Orthodontic Appliances, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Orthodontics, Corrective, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Retrognathism, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Torque, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Treatment Outcome, pubmed-meshheading:15821691-Vertical Dimension
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
pubmed:affiliation
The Royal London Hospital. daljit_s_gill@yahoo.co.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial