Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10908482
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2001-1-3
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Few randomised controlled trials have sufficient power to show clear advantages of different designs of cervical smear collection devices. We studies whether the design of the cervical smear collection device affects rates of inadequate smears and detection of disease and whether the presence of endocervical cells in the smear affects detection of disease.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1469-493X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
CD001036
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2000
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Whitworth Park, Manchester, UK, M13 0JH.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|