Linked Life Data

10518723

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10518723

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-11-17
pubmed:abstractText
Conventional ribotyping was compared with the PCR amplification of the intergenic spacer region between 16S and 23S rRNA genes (PCR-RFLP ribotyping) when applied to the subtyping of sporadic Neisseria meningitidis strains. Thirty isolates out of a total of 36 meningococcal disease cases, reported as having occurred in a particular community over a 7-year endemic period, were analyzed by each of the methods. Only ribotyping with three restriction enzymes (EcoRI, ClaI and XhoI) gave acceptable discriminatory power for short-term epidemiological purposes. We conclude that conventional ribotyping is a suitable method for typing sporadic meningococcal strains and that it cannot be replaced by the more straightforward PCR-RFLP ribotyping method.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0378-1097
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
15
pubmed:volume
179
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
247-53
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of conventional ribotyping and PCR-RFLP ribotyping for the analysis of endemic strains of Neisseria meningitidis isolated in a local community over 7 years.
pubmed:affiliation
Servei de Microbiologia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, E-08025, Barcelona, Spain.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't