Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-11-5
pubmed:abstractText
To compare the cost effectiveness of different programmes of routine antenatal ultrasound screening to detect four key fetal anomalies: serious cardiac anomalies, spina bifida, Down's syndrome and lethal anomalies, using existing evidence.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0306-5456
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
105
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
960-70
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Cost-Benefit Analysis, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Decision Support Techniques, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Down Syndrome, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-False Positive Reactions, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Family Practice, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Female, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Fetus, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Great Britain, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Hospital Costs, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Hospitals, Maternity, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Mass Screening, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Pregnancy, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Pregnancy Outcome, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Pregnancy Trimester, First, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Prevalence, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Sensitivity and Specificity, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Spinal Dysraphism, pubmed-meshheading:9763046-Ultrasonography, Prenatal
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Choosing options for ultrasound screening in pregnancy and comparing cost effectiveness: a decision analysis approach.
pubmed:affiliation
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't