Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-10-7
pubmed:abstractText
The self-report Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) was designed to assess defenses along a developmental continuum. Factor analysis of the original DSQ suggested that the scale assessed four factors or types of defenses, whereas a more recent factor analysis indicated the DSQ measured three-factors: Immature, Neurotic, and Mature. No data, however, regarding the reliability or unique construct validity of DSQ dimensions was published. This article reports on factor analyses of two DSQ versions in a sample of 215 methadone maintenance patients. Results indicate that both DSQ versions are unidimensional, assessing only Immature defenses. The lack of published psychometric data raises concerns regarding the true reliability of DSQ dimensions reported in previous investigations. Prior statements based on DSQ findings may have been incorrect if the DSQ factors were unreliable. Findings from this investigation stress the importance of requiring and evaluating the psychometric integrity of an instrument before employing it in research.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0885-579X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
12
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
119-25
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-1-28
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
A psychometric evaluation of the Defense Style Questionnaire in methadone patients.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.