Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-3-25
pubmed:abstractText
In a two-week double-blind trial l-methadone and racemic methadone were compared for efficacy in substitution treatment for opiate addicts. Before the trial the twenty-six participants had been on stable doses of l-methadone. Patients with evidence of current serious psychological problems were excluded. Patients were evaluated twice a week using a modified FSUCL, physician's withdrawal checklist, self-rating withdrawal scale, and the Beschwerden-Liste (complaint list) according to von Zerssen. Between addicts continuing on l-methadone (n = 13) and those now receiving racemic methadone (n = 13) there were no statistically significant differences. In particular, patients receiving racemic methadone did not complain more frequently of withdrawal symptoms. In a follow-up period of nine weeks after replacement of l-methadone with racemic methadone, there was also no significant increase in complaints about withdrawal symptoms, although six patients needed an elevation of their daily dosage by at least 20 mg racemic methadone.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0176-3679
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
29
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
212-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
The efficacy of L-methadone and racemic methadone in substitution treatment for opiate addicts--a double-blind comparison.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of General Psychiatry, University Hospital, Rhein, Landes- und Hochschulklinik, Essen, Germany.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Controlled Clinical Trial