Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-3-14
pubmed:abstractText
Amylase-resistant starch (RS) represents a substrate for the bacterial flora of the colon, and the question arises as whether RS shares with soluble fibers common mechanisms for their lipid-lowering effects. It is uncertain whether a cholesterol-lowering effect depends basically on an enhanced rate of steroid excretion or whether colonic fermentations also play a role in this effect. In the present study, the effect of RS (25% raw potato starch), of a steroid sequestrant (0.8% cholestyramine), or both were compared on bile acid excretion and lipid metabolism in rats fed semipurified diets. RS diets led to a marked rise in cecal size and the cecal pool of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), as well as SCFA absorption; cholestyramine did not noticeably affect cecal fermentation. Whereas cholestyramine was particularly effective at enhancing bile acid excretion, RS was more effective in lowering plasma cholesterol (-32%) and triglycerides (-29%). The activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase was increased fivefold by cholestyramine and twofold by RS. This induction in rats fed RS diets was concomittant to a depressed fatty acid synthase activity. In rats fed the RS diet, there was a lower concentration of cholesterol in all lipoprotein fractions, especially the (d = 1.040-1.080) fraction high-density lipoprotein (HDL1), while those fed cholestyramine had only a significant reduction of HDL1 cholesterol. In contrast to cholestyramine, RS also depressed the concentration of triglycerides in the triglyceride-rich lipoprotein fraction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0024-4201
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
30
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
847-53
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-19
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Amylases, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Animals, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Anticholesteremic Agents, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Bile Acids and Salts, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Body Weight, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Cecum, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Cholesterol, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Cholestyramine Resin, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Eating, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Feces, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Fermentation, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA Reductases, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Intestine, Small, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Lipoproteins, HDL, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Liver, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Male, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Organ Size, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Rats, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Rats, Wistar, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Starch, pubmed-meshheading:8577229-Triglycerides
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
Resistant starch is more effective than cholestyramine as a lipid-lowering agent in the rat.
pubmed:affiliation
Laboratoire des Maladies Métaboliques, INRA de Clermont-Ferrand/Theix, St-Genès-Champanelle, France.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study