Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8061622rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040669lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8061622lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2717940lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8061622lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0184661lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8061622lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8061622lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0683598lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8061622lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516048lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8061622lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0052009lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:dateCreated1994-9-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:abstractTextThree commonly used transfection techniques (electroporation, calcium phosphate precipitation and scrape loading) and a novel procedure combining the latter two methods were evaluated and conditions optimised for successful transfection of human HepG2 cells with plasmid DNA incorporating a mouse MHC Class I gene and a selectable marker (neomycin transferase gene) conferring resistance to G418. While transfection with linear DNA by scrape-loading gave satisfactory results, transfer of cloned circular DNA by electroporation, calcium phosphate precipitation or a combined use of scrape-loading and calcium phosphate gave best results for HepG2 cells.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:issn1039-9712lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KumarSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LundTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DunckleyM GMGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:authorpubmed-author:O'DowdCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:volume32lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:pagination1059-66lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8061622-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:articleTitleA comparative evaluation of three transfection procedures as assessed by resistance to G418 conferred to HEPG2 cells.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:affiliationTenovus Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton University Hospitals, England.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8061622pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed