Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7626844rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0149925lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2347026lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0370003lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205039lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443165lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016263lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040461lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035363lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220901lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1546566lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:dateCreated1995-9-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:abstractTextThe authors determined the desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content of 45 small-cell lung cancers, by flow-cytometry (FC), from bronchial brushings to asses the prognostic meaning of the DNA index, the percentage of cells in DNA synthesis phase (% S) and the ploidy. Moreover, the value of this tumorous cells brushing was assessed for Flow-cytometric analysis. Bronchial brushing offers some advantages opposite to biopsies, but the low quantity of collected cells reduces the number of tumors analysable by FC. The output is low (39%) for determination of DNA index, and moreover low (22%) for determination of % S. In regard to the flow-cytometry analysis, the DNA content does not show any significant difference of survival where as the % S is related to survival, but it seems to be paradoxical in this study. Indeed, patients with small-cell lung cancer associated to high cells' percentage in DNA synthesis phase have the longest survival.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:languagefrelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:issn0007-4551lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LarraFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChasseventAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TuchaisEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SavaryLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GeslinJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BerruchonJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChrétienM FMFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JeanfaivreTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:volume82lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:pagination364-70lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7626844-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:articleTitle[Prognostic evaluation of small cell lung carcinoma by flow cytometry. A retrospective study from bronchial brushing samples].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:affiliationService de pneumologie, CHU, Angers, France.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7626844pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed