Linked Life Data

6448783

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/6448783

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1981-1-16
pubmed:abstractText
In a comparative study with 242 patients (90 renal, 152 pancreatic and abdominal diseases) ultrasound and computed tomography were compared. With an overall accuracy quota of 92.56% for CT and 85.53 for US, we get the following quotas for the organs: kidney (95.5% Ct, 91.1% US), pancreas and abdominal disease (90.78% CT, 82.23% US). CT has the same specificity (CT: 100, US: 97.7) but a greater sensitivity II (making the final diagnosis) than US (CT: 88.15, US: 78.28). The grading scale of diagnostic efficiency and therapy planning shows a higher value for CT (3.12) than for US (2.89). US is often handicapped by sonic shadows behind calcifications and air, CT by motion artifacts and by the lack of far between the organs. Both methods show the same result for differentiation of the enlarged head of the pancreas.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
1438-9029
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
132
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
262-71
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1980
pubmed:articleTitle
[Computed tomorgraphy and ultrasound; comparative study in diseases of the upper abdomen and retroperitoneal space (author's transl)].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract