Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
4
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1985-11-14
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Doppler ultrasound has now developed to the point where the rate of flow of blood in a given vessel can be measured with appropriate instrumentation. The theoretical basis of Doppler flow measurement is reviewed in this paper, with particular emphasis on the potential and actual sources of error. Three distinct approaches are identified, and the strengths and weaknesses of each discussed. The separate errors involved in estimating the vessel cross-sectional area, the angle of approach, and the Doppler shift are analyzed, together with the question of the uniformity of scattering from the blood. In vivo and in vitro tests of the accuracy obtained using a number of Doppler flow measuring instruments are then reviewed. It is concluded that the Doppler methods are capable of good absolute accuracy when suitably designed equipment is used in appropriate situations, with systematic errors of 6% of less. There are, however, considerable random errors, attributable primarily to errors in measuring the cross-sectional area and the angle of approach. Repeating the measurement of flow several times and averaging the results can reduce these random errors to an acceptable level.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:issn |
0301-5629
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
11
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
625-41
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Measurement of blood flow by ultrasound: accuracy and sources of error.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
In Vitro,
Review
|