Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2654792rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2654792lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2654792lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0150097lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2654792lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008286lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2654792lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008838lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2654792lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011777lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2654792lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025853lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2654792lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392920lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2654792lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023981lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:dateCreated1989-6-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:abstractTextSixty-nine patients with malignant tumors receiving cancer chemotherapy, 90% including cis-platinum, were evaluated in a randomized crossover study for the antiemetic efficacy and the side effects of two antiemetic regimens: chlorpromazine (CPM) 2.5 mg/kg in 5 doses plus dexamethasone (DXM) 0.2 mg/kg in 2 doses, and high-dose metoclopramide (HD-MCP) 10 mg/kg in 5 doses plus the same dose of DXM. In 69% of 173 courses of chemotherapy, antiemetic response was achieved, and in 26% emesis was completely prevented. There was no statistical difference in the response to the antiemetic regimens, but 65% of the patients who completed 3 courses of chemotherapy preferred HD-MCP plus DXM. The main side effects of the treatment were drowsiness, nervousness, diarrhea and extrapyramidal reactions. HD-MCP plus DXM is recommended as a first line antiemetic treatment in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Patients resistant to this treatment should receive CPM plus DXM treatment.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:issn0030-2414lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BiranSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CataneRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrufmanGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GezEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Ben-YosefRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:volume46lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:pagination150-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2654792-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:articleTitleChlorpromazine and dexamethasone versus high-dose metoclopramide and dexamethasone in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy, particularly cis-platinum: a prospective randomized crossover study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Oncology, Sharett Institute, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2654792pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed