Linked Life Data

2044419

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/2044419

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-7-15
pubmed:abstractText
Between May 1988 und March 1989 all patients who underwent elective or emergency surgery followed by intensive care were randomly assigned to group A (n = 149): routine sonography at the postoperative day 1, 3, 7 and 9, group B (n = 151): sonography on demand. In these two groups, the following parameters were compared: number of relaparotomies, lethality of relaparotomies, total lethality, moment of relaparotomy, period of hospitalisation, time spent with sonography. In the analyzed parameters, our examination showed no difference between the two groups. For this we state that the routine sonographical control of the surgical patient with intensive care being opposed to the sonography on demand shows no significant advantage. The demand for a routine sonography as a postoperative control can not be generally supported.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0009-4722
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
62
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
126-31; discussion 131-2
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
["Routine" versus "on demand" ultrasonography in the surgical intensive care patient. A prospective randomized study].
pubmed:affiliation
Klinik für Allgemein- und Abdominalchirurgie, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt/Main.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Randomized Controlled Trial