Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19254586rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007876lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19254586lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1123023lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19254586lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19254586lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038969lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19254586lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0524724lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19254586lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19254586lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521802lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:dateCreated2009-3-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:abstractTextWe sought to compare postoperative pain according to the skin closure method (subcuticular sutures vs staples) after an elective term cesarean section.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:issn1097-6868lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ThomasNancyNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Turcot-LemayL...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RousseauJulie...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GirardKarineKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:volume200lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:pagination265.e1-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19254586...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:year2009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:articleTitleA randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19254586pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed