Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16274599
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
4
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-11-8
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Oocyte cryopreservation certainly represents one of the most attractive developments in the field of assisted reproduction, with the aim of preserving female fertility and circumventing the ethical and legal drawbacks associated with embryo freezing. Despite the achievement of the first pregnancy from frozen oocytes dating back as early as 1987, since then fewer than 150 pregnancies have been reported. Over a long period of time, application of oocyte storage on a large scale has been prevented by various factors, namely poor post-thaw survival. Fertilization rates remained low even after the introduction of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Modifications of slow-freezing protocols, mainly based on the increase of the concentration of sucrose used as non-penetrating cryoprotectant (CPA) and the replacement of sodium with choline, appear to have decisively improved survival rates to over 80%. Investigations at the cellular level on thawed oocytes are largely lacking. Fertilization rates have also benefited from protocol modifications, reaching values indistinguishable from those normally obtained with fresh material. Vitrification protocols have also been tested, giving rise to improvements whose reproducibility is still uncertain. Data on the dynamics of fertilization and preimplantation development of embryos derived from frozen oocytes are extremely scarce. At the moment, clinical efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation cannot be precisely assessed because of the lack of controlled studies, although it appears to be considerably lower than that achieved with embryo freezing. In summary, encouraging advances have been made in the field of oocyte cryopreservation, but presently no protocol can ensure standards of success and safety comparable to those guaranteed by embryo storage.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Oct
|
| pubmed:issn |
1472-6483
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
11
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
421-7
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Calcium,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Cryopreservation,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Cryoprotective Agents,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Embryo Transfer,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Fertilization,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Fertilization in Vitro,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Meiosis,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Microscopy, Electron,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Microscopy, Fluorescence,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Mitochondria,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Oocytes,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Ovarian Follicle,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Pregnancy,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Pregnancy Outcome,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Reproductive Techniques, Assisted,
pubmed-meshheading:16274599-Treatment Outcome
|
| pubmed:year |
2005
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Criteria to assess human oocyte quality after cryopreservation.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Tecnobios Procreazione, Via Dante 15, 40125 Bologna, Italy. coticchio@tecnobiosprocreazione.it
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|