15106218

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15106218

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0002913, umls-concept:C0007876, umls-concept:C0521329
pubmed:issue	2
pubmed:dateCreated	2004-4-23
pubmed:abstractText	Regional anaesthesia (spinal or epidural anaesthesia) for caesarean section is the preferred option when balancing risks and benefits to the mother and her fetus. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section is thought to be advantageous due to simplicity of technique, rapid administration and onset of anaesthesia, reduced risk of systemic toxicity and increased density of spinal anaesthetic block.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/100909747
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:issn	1469-493X
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:CynaA MAM, pubmed-author:MiddletonPP, pubmed-author:OIHH, pubmed-author:ParsonsJJ
pubmed:issnType	Electronic
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	CD003765
pubmed:dateRevised	2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:15106218-Anesthesia, Epidural, pubmed-meshheading:15106218-Anesthesia, Obstetrical, pubmed-meshheading:15106218-Anesthesia, Spinal, pubmed-meshheading:15106218-Cesarean Section, pubmed-meshheading:15106218-Female, pubmed-meshheading:15106218-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:15106218-Pregnancy, pubmed-meshheading:15106218-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
pubmed:year	2004
pubmed:articleTitle	Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section.
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Review, Meta-Analysis