Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10718328rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007876lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10718328lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034721lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10718328lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034693lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10718328lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005615lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10718328lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282151lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10718328lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0542341lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10718328lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10718328lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0314603lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10718328lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521761lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:dateCreated2000-5-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:abstractTextGenetic predisposition and environmental factors such as perinatal complications are believed to contribute to the etiology of schizophrenia, a disorder involving enhanced CNS dopaminergic activity. This study used a rat model to test whether genetic factors and a minor birth complication, i.e. Caesarean section (C-section) birth, interact in producing longterm effects on dopamine-mediated behavior. For this, we compared the effects of vaginal and C-section birth on amphetamine (AMPT)-induced locomotor activity in strains of rats differing in genetic composition. In Sprague-Dawley rats, C-section birth increased AMPT-induced locomotion compared with vaginal birth. By contrast in Lewis rats, C-section birth reduced AMPT-induced locomotion compared with vaginal birth. In Fischer rats, AMPT-induced locomotion was increased by C-section under maternal anesthesia but decreased by C-section after maternal decapitation, compared with vaginal birth. It is concluded that a minor birth complication like C-section can have differing long-term effects on dopaminergic function in the rat, depending on the genetic composition of the individual.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:issn0959-4965lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BoksaPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VaillancourtC...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BergerNNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:day28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:volume11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:pagination639-43lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10718328...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:articleTitleGenetic factors modulate effects of C-section birth on dopaminergic function in the rat.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Verdun, Quebec, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10718328pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10718328lld:pubmed