Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10321201
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1999-5-18
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Compomers and resin-modified glass ionomers have been developed to improve the physical properties of traditional glass ionomer cements. This project compared the toothbrush wear-resistance of three compomers (Compoglass, Dyract, Hytac) and three resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials (Fuji II LC, Photac-Fil, Vitremer) to that of two resin-based composites (Herculite XRV, Silux Plus). Specimens (n = 7) were prepared according to manufacturers' instructions and stored in a humidor for 48 hours prior to testing. The specimens were subjected to 120,000 strokes at 1.5 Hz, using a brush-head force of 200 g on a Manly V-8 cross-brushing machine. The slurry contained a 50:50 (w/w) mixture of toothpaste and deionized water. Abrasion-resistance was calculated by measuring specimen mass-loss prior to and subsequent to brushing. The data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. Significant differences (p < .0001) in mass-loss were found, and loss ranged from 0.013 +/- 0.003 g (Hytac) to 0.061 +/- 0.009 g (Compoglass). No correlation (p = .959) between wear-resistance and experimentally determined filler content existed. This study showed that all but one hybrid resin-ionomer type material exhibited a resistance to toothbrush wear that was as good as or better than that of the two traditional resin-based composite materials.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
D
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1040-1466
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
10
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
309-14
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10321201-Analysis of Variance,
pubmed-meshheading:10321201-Composite Resins,
pubmed-meshheading:10321201-Dental Restoration Wear,
pubmed-meshheading:10321201-Glass Ionomer Cements,
pubmed-meshheading:10321201-Linear Models,
pubmed-meshheading:10321201-Materials Testing,
pubmed-meshheading:10321201-Toothbrushing
|
pubmed:year |
1998
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of wear-resistance of Class V restorative materials.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Section of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|