is in mapping relation with

These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice.

Source:http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#mappingRelation

Download in:

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	rdf:Property, rdf:Property, rdf:Property, rdf:Property, rdf:Property, rdf:Property, rdf:Property, rdf:Property, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:ObjectProperty
rdfs:comment	These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice.@en, These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice.@en, These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice.@en, These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice.@en, These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice.@en, These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice.@en, These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice.@en, These concept mapping relations mirror semantic relations, and the data model defined below is similar (with the exception of skos:exactMatch) to the data model defined for semantic relations. A distinct vocabulary is provided for concept mapping relations, to provide a convenient way to differentiate links within a concept scheme from links between concept schemes. However, this pattern of usage is not a formal requirement of the SKOS data model, and relies on informal definitions of best practice.@en
rdfs:subPropertyOf	skos:semanticRelation, skos:semanticRelation, skos:semanticRelation, skos:semanticRelation, skos:semanticRelation, skos:semanticRelation, skos:semanticRelation, skos:semanticRelation
rdfs:label	is in mapping relation with@en, is in mapping relation with@en, is in mapping relation with@en, is in mapping relation with@en, is in mapping relation with@en, is in mapping relation with@en, is in mapping relation with@en, is in mapping relation with@en
rdfs:isDefinedBy	http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core, http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core, http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core, http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core, http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core, http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core, http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core, http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core
skos:definition	Relates two concepts coming, by convention, from different schemes, and that have comparable meanings@en, Relates two concepts coming, by convention, from different schemes, and that have comparable meanings@en, Relates two concepts coming, by convention, from different schemes, and that have comparable meanings@en, Relates two concepts coming, by convention, from different schemes, and that have comparable meanings@en, Relates two concepts coming, by convention, from different schemes, and that have comparable meanings@en, Relates two concepts coming, by convention, from different schemes, and that have comparable meanings@en, Relates two concepts coming, by convention, from different schemes, and that have comparable meanings@en, Relates two concepts coming, by convention, from different schemes, and that have comparable meanings@en