Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
10
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1998-12-29
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
We have recently established that local exposure to a 929.2 MHz electromagnetic near-field, used for cellular phones, does not promote rat liver carcinogenesis in a medium-term bioassay system. In the present study, a 1.439 GHz electromagnetic near-field (EMF), another microwave band employed for cellular phones in Japan, was similarly investigated. Time division multiple access (TDMA) signals for the Personal Digital Cellular (PDC) Japanese cellular telephone standard system were directed to rats through a quarter-wavelength monopole antenna. Numerical dosimetry showed that the peak SARs within the liver were 1.91-0.937 W/kg, while the whole-body average specific absorption rates (SARs) were 0.680-0.453 W/kg, when the time-averaged antenna radiation power was 0.33 W. Exposure was for 90 min a day, 5 days a week, over 6 weeks, to male F344 rats given a single dose of diethylnitrosamine (200 mg/kg, i.p.) 2 weeks previously. At week 3, all rats were subjected to a two-thirds partial hepatectomy. At week 8, the experiment was terminated and the animals were killed. Carcinogenic potential was scored by comparing the numbers and areas of the induced glutathione S-transferase placental form (GST-P)-positive foci in the livers of exposed (48) and sham-exposed rats (48). Despite increased serum levels of corticosterone, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and melatonin, the numbers and the areas of GST-P-positive foci were not significantly altered by the exposure. These findings clearly indicated that local body exposure to a 1.439 GHz EMF, as in the case of a 929.2 MHz field, has no promoting effect on rat liver carcinogenesis in the present model.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Oct
|
| pubmed:issn |
0910-5050
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
89
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
995-1002
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Adrenocorticotropic Hormone,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Carcinogenicity Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Corticosterone,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Electromagnetic Fields,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Enzyme Induction,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Glutathione Transferase,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Hepatectomy,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Japan,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Liver,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Liver Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Liver Regeneration,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Melatonin,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Microwaves,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Organ Size,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Rats,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Rats, Inbred F344,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Telephone,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Time Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:9849576-Weight Gain
|
| pubmed:year |
1998
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
The 1.5 GHz electromagnetic near-field used for cellular phones does not promote rat liver carcinogenesis in a medium-term liver bioassay.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
1st Department of Pathology, Nagoya City University Medical School.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|