Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-2-16
pubmed:abstractText
This paper presents two methods for absorbed dose determination with ionization chambers at short distance from 60Co and 192Ir brachytherapy sources. The methods are modifications of the Bragg-Gray and large cavity principles given in the IAEA code of practice for high- and medium-energy photon beams. A non-uniformity correction factor to account for the non-uniform electron fluence in the air cavity is introduced into the methods. The absorbed dose rates were determined from ionization chamber measurements at distances between 1.5 and 5.0 cm from the brachytherapy sources. The agreement between the two methods is excellent in 60Co brachytherapy dosimetry. For 192Ir dosimetry, the difference is less than 2.5% at all distances. In absorbed dose rate calculations with the 60Co brachytherapy source, the ratios between calculated and experimentally determined absorbed dose rates are 0.987 and 0.994 depending on the method used for absorption and scatter correction. In 192Ir dosimetry, the large cavity principle gives almost identical values to those which can be obtained with the AAPM recommendations. Using the chambers according to the Bragg-Gray principle in 192Ir dosimetry, the agreement with AAPM calculated absorbed dose rates is within 2.5% at all distances. The uncertainty, expressed as one standard deviation, in the experimentally determined absorbed dose is estimated to be between 3 and 4%.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0031-9155
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
43
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
3183-94
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Absorbed dose determination at short distance from 60Co and 192Ir brachytherapy sources.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Radiation Physics, University of Göteborg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study