Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1999-1-21
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Antiarrhythmic drugs are known to affect the depolarization and repolarization time in a different fashion. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of Sotalol, Flecainide and Propafenone on some common (QT, QTc, JT, JTc) or uncommon (QTc dispersion, T-peak to T-end interval) electrocardiographic parameters in order to evaluate the effects of these antiarrhythmic drugs on ventricular repolarization time both in terms of absolute values and of dispersion across the myocardium. The analysis of these antiarrhythmic drug effects was performed on the standard 12-lead electrocardiograms of 31 patients (17F and 14M, age 38.1+/-17 years, range 11-67 years) in the free-drug state and at the steady state after oral treatment with Sotalol (160 mg daily), Flecainide (200 mg daily) and Propafenone (450 mg daily). These drugs were prescribed, separately, to all the 31 patients, free of underlying structural heart disease, for the treatment of their atrio-ventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia. Data of the present study show that Sotalol, over the range prescribed, significantly prolongs ventricular repolarization index QT (P=0.001), JT (P=0.0001) and JTc (P=0.0001) values in an homogeneous fashion, as shown by the significant decrease in QTcD (P=0.019) and Tp-Te (P=0.01). On the contrary, Flecainide treatment was associated with an increase in QTcD (P=0.029), Tp-Te (0.0001), QT (P=0.001), QTc (P=0.0001) and QRS (P=0.0001), with no significant changes in JT and JTc. Propafenone, over the range prescribed, did not affect repolarization time, resulting only in a prolongation of depolarization time as expressed by the increase of QRS (P=0.0001).
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
0167-5273
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
30
|
pubmed:volume |
66
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
157-64
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2008-11-21
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Anti-Arrhythmia Agents,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Child,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Electrocardiography,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Flecainide,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Heart Conduction System,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Propafenone,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Sotalol,
pubmed-meshheading:9829329-Ventricular Function
|
pubmed:year |
1998
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Compared effects of sotalol, flecainide and propafenone on ventricular repolarization in patients free of underlying structural heart disease.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Istituto Medico Chirurgico di Cardiologia, Cattedra di Cardiologia, Italy.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|