Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-11-19
pubmed:abstractText
Five patients with adverse reactions to peak flow monitoring are presented: 2 patients had herniation of abdominal content, while the others presented with vasovagal syncope, minor depression and neurotic preoccupation with peak flow values, respectively. As a result, 3 of the 5 patients became noncompliant. For nonpsychological somatic adverse reactions, we calculated an incidence of 1.1 cases/1,000 patients started on peak flow monitoring. Adverse reactions with a psychological background may be more frequent. Clinicians should bear in mind that patients noncompliant with peak flow monitoring may have discontinued because of adverse reactions.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0025-7931
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
65
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
320-2
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-11
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Adverse reactions to peak flow monitoring. Report of 5 patients.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Case Reports