Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-7-30
pubmed:abstractText
Endocervical sampling for microbiological and pathological screening is laborious and expensive due to different sampling devices and techniques. The purpose of this study was to examine if the routine procedure could be simplified by using a cytobrush for concurrent cytology and sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis detection using the PCR method or cell culture. As a sampling device control we used a conventional rayon swab. RESULTS: Culture: Out of 873 paired endocervical specimens, C. trachomatis was isolated in 68 swab specimens and in 65 cytobrush specimens (overall detection rate 8.4%). The cytobrush proved less suitable than the swab for the isolation of C. trachomatis as 31.5% of the cytobrush samples showed cytotoxicity to the cultured cells vs 0.9% of the swab samples. PCR: In a random sample of 427 paired endocervical specimens, C. trachomatis was detected in 45 pairs without any difference between the two sampling devices. The sensitivity of PCR was 93.8% vs 89.6% and 87.5% in cultured swab and cultured cytobrush specimens, respectively. The cytobrush can therefore be recommended as a cervical sampling device if a PCR assay is used for the detection of C. trachomatis, but not if the cell culture method is used, due to high cytotoxicity. Furthermore, the same cytobrush may be used for cervical cytological sampling and thereafter placed in transport medium for subsequent C. trachomatis detection if the PCR technique is used.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0903-4641
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
106
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
580-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis: the value of cytobrush specimens for detection by PCR compared with cell culture.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study