Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9597571rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006142lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008976lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0079459lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1518999lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010583lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015133lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178602lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0300926lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1306673lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:dateCreated1998-8-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:abstractTextThe purpose of this study was to develop a less toxic outpatient chemotherapy regimen for mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Three hundred eighteen patients with newly diagnosed stage II-III breast cancer who had received conventional dose adjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to receive intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 6 micrograms/kg/day (ID-Cy, n = 162) or high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and the same doses of etoposide and G-CSF (HD-Cy, n = 156) followed by collection of PBSC. Three hundred seventeen of 318 patients had apheresis performed, and 315 received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by PBSC support. The median numbers of CD34+ cells collected in a median of two apheresis following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 19.9 and 22.2 x 10(6)/kg, respectively (p = 0.04). The fractions of patients achieving CD34+ cell doses > or = 2.5 or > or = 5.0 x 10(6)/kg were not different between the two regimens. More patients receiving HD-Cy had grade 3-4 nausea (p = 0.001), vomiting (p = 0.03), and mucositis (p = 0.04). The fractions of patients having a neutrophil nadir < 0.5 x 10(9)/L following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 0.83 and 0.95, respectively (p = < 0.001). The fractions of patients having a platelet nadir < 25 x 10(9)/L following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 0.13 and 0.51, respectively (p = < 0.001). More patients in the HD-Cy group received platelet (p < 0.001) and red blood cell (p < 0.001) transfusions and were admitted to the hospital more frequently (p = 0.03) than patients receiving ID-Cy. Three hundred fifteen patients received HDC followed by infusion of PBSC. There were no significant differences in the incidence of transplant-related death or early survival between patients receiving ID-Cy or HD-Cy followed by HDC. It was concluded that a regimen of Cy 2 g/m2 with etoposide and G-CSF was effective for mobilization of PBSC with low morbidity and resource utilization in patients with limited prior chemotherapy exposure.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:issn1061-6128lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BucknerC DCDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SmithRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeffRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchwartzbergL...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BirchRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HainsworthJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GrecoTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TauerKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MurphyM NMNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeekerTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeaverC HCHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MannerCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Morgan-IhrigC...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchwerkoskeJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MacAnenyBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:volume7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:pagination141-50lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:dateRevised2006-4-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9597571-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:year1998lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:articleTitleA randomized trial of two doses of cyclophosphamide with etoposide and G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in 318 patients with stage II-III breast cancer.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:affiliationClinical Trials Division of Response Oncology, Inc., Memphis, TN 38117, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9597571pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9597571lld:pubmed