Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1998-6-9
pubmed:abstractText
Ligase chain reaction (LCR) (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.) with first-catch urine specimens was used to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in 465 asymptomatic military women attending clinics for routine Papanicolaou smear tests. Results were compared to results of cervical culture to determine the sensitivity of the urine LCR and the possible presence of inhibitors of amplification in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Discrepant results for LCR and culture were resolved by direct fluorescent antibody staining of culture sediments, two different PCR assays, and LCR for the outer membrane protein 1 gene. The prevalence of Chlamydia in specimens by urine LCR was 7.3% compared to 5% by culture. For 434 women with matching specimens, there were 11 more specimens positive by LCR than were positive by culture, of which all but one were determined to be true positives. There were four culture-positive, LCR-negative specimens, all from nonpregnant women. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of urine LCR after discrepant results were resolved were 88.6, 99.7, 96.9, and 99.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of culture was 71.4%. From the 148 pregnant women (prevalence by LCR, 6.8%), there were no patients who were cervical culture positive and urine LCR negative to indicate the presence in pregnant women of inhibitors of LCR. Additionally, a subset of 55 of the LCR-negative frozen urine specimens from pregnant women that had been previously processed in LCR buffer were inoculated with 5 cell culture inclusion forming units of C. trachomatis each and retested by LCR; all tested positive, indicating the absence of inhibitors of LCR in urine from these pregnant women. The use of LCR testing of urine specimens from asymptomatic women, whether pregnant or not, offers a sensitive and easy method to detect C. trachomatis infection in women.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-1736659, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-1780069, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-1922849, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-1956535, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-2199517, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-2247804, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-3282465, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-7559945, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-7594691, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-7790456, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-7823713, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-7852556, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-8233002, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-8235929, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-8418395, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-8567922, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-8880487, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-8885072, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-8916511, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-8940322, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-8940450, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9024385, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9038024, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9100646, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9100648, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9132979, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9163477, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9316907, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9316920, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9399497, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9466530, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9471930, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9574695-9518379
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0095-1137
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
36
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1300-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1998
pubmed:articleTitle
Use of ligase chain reaction with urine versus cervical culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an asymptomatic military population of pregnant and nonpregnant females attending Papanicolaou smear clinics.
pubmed:affiliation
Infectious Disease Division, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. cgaydos@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.