Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9326222rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9326222lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024400lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9326222lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040052lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9326222lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0079459lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9326222lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018183lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9326222lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024432lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:dateCreated1997-11-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:abstractTextThrombopoietin (TPO) was evaluated for efficacy in a placebo-controlled study in rhesus monkeys with concurrent administration of either granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or granulocyte CSF, (G-CSF). Rhesus monkeys were subjected to 5 Gy total-body irradiation (TBI), resulting in 3 weeks of profound pancytopenia, and received either TPO 5 microg/kg intravenously (I.V.) at day 1 (n = 4), GM-CSF 25 microg/kg subcutaneously (S.C.) for 14 days (n = 4), TPO and GM-CSF (n = 4), G-CSF 10 microg/kg/d S.C. for 14 days (n = 3), TPO and G-CSF (n = 4), or placebo (carrier, n = 4; historical controls, n = 8). Single-dose I.V. treatment with TPO 1 day after TBI effectively counteracted the need for thrombocyte transfusions (provided whenever thrombocyte levels were <40 x 10(9)/L) and accelerated platelet reconstitution to normal levels 2 weeks earlier than placebo controls. TPO/GM-CSF was more effective than single-dose TPO alone in stimulating thrombocyte regeneration, with a less profound nadir and a further accelerated recovery to normal thrombocyte counts, as well as a slight overshoot to supranormal levels of thrombocytes. Monkeys treated with TPO/GM-CSF uniformly did not require thrombocyte transfusions, whereas those treated with GM-CSF alone needed two to three transfusions, similar to the placebo-treated monkeys, which required, on average, three transfusions. Also, reticulocyte production was stimulated by TPO and further augmented in monkeys treated with TPO/GM-CSF. TPO alone did not stimulate neutrophil regeneration, whereas GM-CSF shortened the period of neutrophil counts less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L by approximately 1 week; TPO/GM-CSF treatment elevated the neutrophil nadir, but did not further accelerate recovery to normal values. TPO also augemented the neturophil response to G-CSF, resulting in similar patterns of reconstitution following TPO/G-CSF and TPO/GM-CSF treatment. TPO/GM-CSF resulted in significantly increased reconstitution of CD34+ bone marrow cells and progenitor cells such as GM-CFU and BFU-E. Adverse effects of combining TPO with the CSFs were not observed. It is concluded that (1) a single I.V. administration of TPO is sufficient to prevent severe thrombocytopenia following myelosuppression, (2) TPO/G-CSF and TPO/GM-CSF treatment result in distinct response patterns, with TPO/GM-CSF being superior to TPO/G-CSF in stimulating thrombocyte and erythrocyte recovery while being equivalent in stimulating neutrophil recovery; and (3) TPO significantly improves the performance of CSFs in alleviating severe neutropenia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:issn0006-4971lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EatonD LDLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EgelandTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WagemakerGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ThomasG RGRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NeelisK JKJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HartongS CSClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:day1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:volume90lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:pagination2565-73lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9326222-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:year1997lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:articleTitleThe efficacy of single-dose administration of thrombopoietin with coadministration of either granulocyte/macrophage or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in myelosuppressed rhesus monkeys.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:affiliationInstitute of Hematology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9326222pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9326222lld:pubmed