Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-10-17
pubmed:abstractText
At present, the laboratory diagnosis of intestinal infections caused by microsporidia depends on the detection of the typical spores either with a modified trichrome stain (MTS) or by staining with fluorochromes. The purpose of the present study was (i) to compare staining with MTS (MTS method) and the staining with the fluorochrome Uvitex 2B (U2B method) with respect to their sensitivities and specificities, particularly in the presence of low numbers of spores, and (ii) to evaluate their reliabilities under routine laboratory conditions. First, 30 negative human stool specimens as well as 30 specimens enriched with a low concentration of microsporidial spores were examined. The U2B and MTS methods detected 27 and 30, of the positive samples, respectively (95% confidence intervals for sensitivity, 0.73 to 0.98 for the U2B method and 0.88 to 1.00 for the MTS method) without yielding false-positive results (95% confidence intervals for specificity, 0.88 to 1.00 for the MTS and U2B methods). In addition, analysis of serial dilutions of 17 stool specimens from AIDS patients containing microsporidia revealed comparable detection thresholds (P = 0.52) for both methods. Finally, 40 slides prepared from one stool specimen containing very few microsporidia and 40 negative slides were included in the routine diagnostic program during 1 month in order to monitor laboratory handling and run-to-run variations. Again, both methods exhibited comparable sensitivities (95% confidence intervals, 0.83 to 0.99 for the MTS method and 0.91 to 1.00 for the U2B method) and specificities (95% confidence intervals, 0.91 to 1.00 for the MTS and U2B methods). In conclusion, MTS and U2B methods are equally useful in the diagnosis of microsporidiosis. However, since detection thresholds for both methods differed considerably in all diluted stool specimens, performance of a combination of both methods may be more sensitive than the performance of only one procedure in the event of very low numbers of microsporidial spores.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-1370122, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-1466846, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-1612573, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-1690218, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-1692561, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-1995733, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-3061981, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-4009510, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-7508457, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-7511873, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-7516908, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-7517951, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-7537939, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-7540626, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-7683076, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-7724235, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-7834600, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-7915548, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-8195366, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-8263205, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-8398544, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-8408691, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-8418171, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-8457797, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-8586689, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-8940480, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/9276399-9003613
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0095-1137
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
35
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
2266-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1997
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparative evaluation of modified trichrome and Uvitex 2B stains for detection of low numbers of microsporidial spores in stool specimens.
pubmed:affiliation
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Infektionsimmunologie, Auguste-Viktoria-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't