Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9212967rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0175677lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9212967lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178784lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9212967lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007202lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9212967lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0806140lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9212967lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9212967lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1708528lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9212967lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0079411lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9212967lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205157lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:dateCreated1997-9-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:abstractTextThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of 3 different types of flow generation for cardiopulmonary bypass on gastrointestinal permeability and on neutrophil expression of CD11b, a surface marker of neutrophil activation. Fourteen patients undergoing elective coronary revascularization were selected randomly to receive 1 of the 3 flow generation techniques (roller, pulsatile, or centrifugal). Intestinal permeability was assessed by the fraction of an oral dose of 51chromium-ethylenediaminetetraacetate (51Cr-EDTA) recovered in the urine over 24 h. Neutrophil activation was determined by expression of CD11b markers at 6 time points. Overall, the 14 patients showed significant increases in intestinal permeability. It was not possible to demonstrate statistically significant differences among the flow generation groups; however, when compared to both roller pump groups, the centrifugal pump group showed a 3.2% reduction in intestinal permeability. There was no change in the expression of CD11b receptors throughout the time points, nor was there a relationship of CD11b markers to the flow generation technique.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:issn0160-564Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WilsonI CIClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NashGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HuttonPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BoivinC MCMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GrahamT RTRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HydeJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RiddingtonD...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:volume21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:pagination825-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9212967-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:year1997lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:articleTitlePrevention of remote organ injury in cardiopulmonary bypass: the impact of flow generation technique.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Medical Center, United Kingdom.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9212967pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed