Linked Life Data

9212355

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/9212355

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-9-2
pubmed:abstractText
The efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH) and warfarin for prophylaxis of thrombo-embolism in orthopaedic surgery were compared using meta-analysis techniques. Twenty-two studies were included, 2 of which compared LMWH to warfarin. The mean probabilities to develop deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism and major and minor bleeding using UFH were: 0.21 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.18-0.24); 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01-0.02); 0.05 (95% CI: 0.03-0.07), and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.17-0.22), respectively. The relative risk (RR) of DVT for LMWH vs. UFH was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.60-0.91), p < 0.05 and for LMWH vs. warfarin 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.87), p < 0.05. The RR of minor bleeding for LMWH vs. UFH was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.92), p < 0.05. The RR of minor bleeding for LMWH vs. warfarin was 3.28 (95% CI: 2.21-4.70), p < 0.05. Conclusion: in orthopaedic surgery, LMWH is significantly superior to both UFH and warfarin in the prevention of DVT and results in significantly less minor bleeding complications when compared to UFH, but significantly more minor bleeding when compared to warfarin.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0301-0147
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
27
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
75-84
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin and warfarin for thrombo-embolism prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
pubmed:affiliation
Institute for Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Riehen, Switzerland.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Meta-Analysis