Linked Life Data

9001484

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/9001484

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7073
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-2-10
pubmed:abstractText
Since 1948 there has been constant debate over whether the NHS is underfunded. The debate heats up when crises in the NHS hit the headlines as occurred last year. Various groups, of all shades of the political spectrum, have argued that the NHS is unsustainable with current funding increases because of demands from demographic change, new technology, and increasing expectations. The government is almost a lone voice in arguing that the NHS is sustainable but may not be doing enough to ensure that it remains so in future. This article examines seven broad approaches used to support the case that the NHS is underfunded and concludes that all have flaws. There is no satisfactory answer to the question of whether the NHS is underfunded because the answer requires value judgments that will inevitably give rise to disagreements.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0959-8138
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
4
pubmed:volume
314
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
58-61
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-20
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1997
pubmed:articleTitle
Funding the NHS. Is the NHS underfunded?
pubmed:affiliation
Policy Institute, King's Fund, London.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article