Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
9
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1996-12-6
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Two commercially available bacterial filters to be used as part of the mechanical ventilation unit during anaesthesia were tested for hygienic criteria. Manufacturers claim that bacterial breathing filters have a filtration capacity of about 99.995%, so that there would be no need for thermal disinfection of tubing and ventilation circuits after each use. One filter is designed for a single use only, the other can be used up to 24 times after sterilisation. Both filters consist of hydrophobic glass fibres.
|
| pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
| pubmed:language |
ger
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Sep
|
| pubmed:issn |
0003-2417
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
45
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
814-8
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1996
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
[Comparative study of the efficiency of bacterial filters in long-term mechanical ventilation].
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract
|