|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
6
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1997-3-6
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This paper is a response to Dr Shinebourne's response to my recent paper assessing the relative merits of the Staffordshire Protocol on covert video surveillance. Dr Shinebourne does not take the opportunity to rebut the criticisms made of the text of the protocol. It is further suggested that judicial oversight of the use of CVS might accord the process a degree of proportionality.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:keyword |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
E
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0306-6800
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
22
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
349-50; discussion 351
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-18
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Child,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Child Abuse,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Child Advocacy,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Clinical Protocols,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Deception,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Ethics, Medical,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Informed Consent,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Judicial Role,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Law Enforcement,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Parents,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Trust,
pubmed-meshheading:8961120-Videotape Recording
|
|
pubmed:year |
1996
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Covert video surveillance: the Staffordshire Protocol--a response to Dr Shinebourne.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Faculty of Health and Social Care, Leeds Metropolitan University.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comment
|
