Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-3-28
pubmed:abstractText
Biochemical tests alone do not adequately differentiate the various Bacteroides species, groups, and antimicrobial-resistant variants. Consequently, we used a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting technique, with either a single nonspecific primer derived from the t-DNA intergenic spacer region (T3B) or a single primer that anneals to minisatellite DNA sequences (M13 core), to identify and characterize 58 clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group species (B. fragilis, B. distasonis, and B. caccae). In addition to species- and subspecies-specific differences, 4 strains of B. fragilis, 1 of B. distasonis, and 3 of B. caccae that showed increased resistance to imipenem, ampicillin, and ampicillin/sulbactam also produced unique PCR fingerprint profiles. Analysis by the clinical source of isolation (i.e. blood or intraabdominal, skin, or soft-tissue infection) indicated that no particular PCR fingerprint type was associated with greater pathogenicity of any individual clinical source. The PCR fingerprinting technique proves to be a useful tool for species identification and taxonomic studies, as well as for epidemiological studies of Bacteroides species.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
1058-4838
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
23 Suppl 1
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
S66-72
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-19
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Characterization of indole-negative Bacteroides fragilis group species with use of polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting and resistance profiles.
pubmed:affiliation
Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Leipzig, Germany. 100752-1572@compuserve.com
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't