Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9 Suppl
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-12-6
pubmed:abstractText
Many centers advocate bioprosthetic valves in the elderly to avoid anticoagulation, in particular when patient survival is less than the expected valve durability. Because expected survival in the elderly is increasing and age-specific risk of anticoagulation in the elderly is not known, we examined valve- and anticoagulation-related morbidity in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with bioprostheses or mechanical prostheses.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0009-7322
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
1
pubmed:volume
94
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
II121-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
pubmed:affiliation
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't