Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-9-26
pubmed:abstractText
Centralized, quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) has become the standard for determining change in coronary anatomy in clinical investigations. QCA systems and laboratory methods, however, vary among core facilities, and analysis variability among angiographic core laboratories (ACL) has not be studied. We evaluated QCA accuracy and variability among active ACL, using differing QCA systems by comparing analyses of phantom and clinical cinefilm images. Automated, unedited analyses were performed on images of 11 plexiglass phantom lumens (0.67-5.05 mm) acquired under varying radiographic conditions. Analysis differences from actual luminal diameters ranged widely (+0.42 - (-)0.45 mm) among ACL. Measurement of diameters < 1.0 mm were overestimated and diameters > 3.0 mm were underestimated. Measurements of midrange diameters (> 1.0 mm and < 3.0 mm) were most comparable among ACL (93% within +/- 0.2 mm). Clinical image analysis was performed using differing QCA systems and laboratory methodology on 11 randomly selected study films. Comparative analyses revealed significant variability between laboratories in the assessment of minimal lumen diameter (0.22 +/- 0.38 mm P < 0.05). These data describe analysis variability among ACL and demonstrate a need for establishing ACL performance standards.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0098-6569
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
37
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
24-31
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparisons of angiographic core laboratory analyses of phantom and clinical images: interlaboratory variability.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study