Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-10-17
pubmed:abstractText
The capabilities of current protein structure prediction methods have been assessed from the outcome of a set of blind tests. In comparative modeling, many of the numerical methods did not perform as well as expected, although the resulting structures are still of great practical use. The new methods of fold identification ('threading') were partially successful, and show considerable promise for the future. Except for secondary structure data, results from traditional ab initio methods were poor. A second blind prediction experiment is underway, and progress in all areas is expected.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0958-1669
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
7
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
422-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
The current state of the art in protein structure prediction.
pubmed:affiliation
Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Rockville 20850, USA. jmoult@indigo5.carb.nist.gov
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't