Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-3-19
pubmed:abstractText
In this study the susceptibility of 91 methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus intermedius strains (MRSI and MSSI, respectively) against 15 antimicrobial agents was determined. The activity of the antimicrobial agents was studied at pH 7.2 and pH 8.5. Methicillin was more active at pH 7.2 (28 strains methicillin-resistant) than at pH 8.5 (55 strains methicillin-resistant). Gentamicin showed excellent activity, with only 3 strains resistant at pH 8.5. However, gentamicin would have to be administered parenterally. Oxytetracycline cannot be recommended for treatment of canine staphylococcal dermatitis, due to the high percentage (over 25%) of strains that were found to be resistant. Clindamycin showed little activity in inhibiting growth of the strains studied, the percent resistance at pH 7.2 was 93.4%. Rifampin behaved differently at the two pH values. However, a close relationship was noted between methicillin-resistant and rifampin-resistant strains, particularly at the lower pH. Of the fluoroquinolones, ciprofloxacin or enrofloxacin would be a good useful alternative for the treatment of methicillin-resistant strains of S. intermedius. Lastly, very high resistance to sulphamethoxypyridazine was found, as was the case with trimethoprim and a combination of trimethoprim/sulphamethoxypyridazine, against not only MRSI but also MSSI strains.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0140-7783
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
19
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
118-23
pubmed:dateRevised
2003-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1996
pubmed:articleTitle
In vitro activity of fifteen antimicrobial agents against methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus intermedius.
pubmed:affiliation
Departamento de Medicina y Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article