Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8718056rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0376558lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8718056lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0679006lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8718056lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:dateCreated1996-9-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:abstractTextAs a result of rapid developments in medical technology, health-care workers are increasingly faced with decisions regarding the prolongation of life and the withdrawal of treatment. Such decisions are often extremely complex and present a moral dilemma: they are further complicated by prevailing politico-economic, social and cultural influences. This article contrasts deontological and utilitarian philosophical perspectives, and discusses ethical principles which impinge on the decision making process. A knowledge and understanding of these philosophies and principles are essential to assist clinical practitioners in the examination of moral issues surrounding life and death.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:keywordhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:keywordhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:citationSubsetElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:issn0962-1067lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TrnobranskiP...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:volume5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:pagination233-40lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:dateRevised2005-11-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8718056-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:articleTitleThe decision to prolong life: ethical perspectives of a clinical dilemma.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8718056pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed