Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1996-9-23
|
pubmed:abstractText |
As a result of rapid developments in medical technology, health-care workers are increasingly faced with decisions regarding the prolongation of life and the withdrawal of treatment. Such decisions are often extremely complex and present a moral dilemma: they are further complicated by prevailing politico-economic, social and cultural influences. This article contrasts deontological and utilitarian philosophical perspectives, and discusses ethical principles which impinge on the decision making process. A knowledge and understanding of these philosophies and principles are essential to assist clinical practitioners in the examination of moral issues surrounding life and death.
|
pubmed:keyword | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
E
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
pubmed:issn |
0962-1067
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
5
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
233-40
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2005-11-16
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Decision Making,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Ethical Theory,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Ethics, Nursing,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Euthanasia, Active,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Life Support Care,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Patient Participation,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Personhood,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Quality of Life,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Resource Allocation,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Right to Die,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Terminal Care,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Value of Life,
pubmed-meshheading:8718056-Withholding Treatment
|
pubmed:year |
1996
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The decision to prolong life: ethical perspectives of a clinical dilemma.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|