Linked Life Data

8550713

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/8550713

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8-9
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-2-22
pubmed:abstractText
61 patients with aggressive gastro-esophageal reflux have been prospectively treated, 29 by open surgery and 32 by laparoscopy. There is no mortality and the morbidity is not significantly different (3 per cent vs 5 per cent). Hospital stay is strongly reduced in the laparoscopic group (5.4 days vs 8.9 days p = 0.02). Either the period of no professional activity (21.3 days vs 38.2 days p = 0.02). In both group, dysphagia is noted in 30% of the patients at 1 month and 3% at 4 months. All patients have had pre-operatively a mano-Ph-metry evaluation. At 4 months, the follow-up rate is 100% and all patient have been controlled with a 24 hours mano-Ph-metry. There is no difference between open and laparoscopic surgery. The mean SIO pressure had increased in both group from 3.6 mmHg to 18.1 mmHg (p = 0.001). There is only one failure in the beginning of the learning curve (4th patients in the "laparoscopy group" (3.1%). These study suggest that laparoscopic treatment could be proposed in the majority of failures of medical treatment in gastro-oesophageal reflux.
pubmed:language
fre
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0021-7697
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
132
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
325-31
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
[Gastroesophageal reflux. Conventional surgery versus laparoscopic treatment. Prospective study (61 cases). Mano-Ph-metric evaluation at 4 months].
pubmed:affiliation
Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Université Paris XIII, Bondy, France.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract