Linked Life Data

8336988

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/8336988

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1993-8-20
pubmed:abstractText
Sixty patients having their wisdom teeth removed under general anaesthetic were tested immediately after surgery and 2 weeks later. Subjects completed versions of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) and the UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist (UMACL). At the second test they were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups and either cued for their mood experience, cued for their pain experience or asked to recognise those words which they had chosen on the first occasion. Forty-nine patients completed the study. Accuracy of remembering was measured using Cohen's kappa (kappa) as a measure of agreement over the 2 tests. In general, accuracy of remembering was only 'fair' for both mood and pain (kappa = 0.5). Contrary to expectation cueing did not improve specific recognition, e.g., cueing for pain did not improve memory for pain words. However, there was evidence that memory of mood was more accurate when patients were cued to remember their pain. There was also evidence of a shift in the hedonic tone of the remembered mood; patients remembered their mood as being more negative than it actually was.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0304-3959
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
53
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
183-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1993
pubmed:articleTitle
Memory for acute pain experience is specifically inaccurate but generally reliable.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Psychology, University of Leeds, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't