Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8331271rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007097lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8331271lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8331271lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014245lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8331271lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010819lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8331271lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8331271lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0868928lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:dateCreated1993-8-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:abstractTextFrom 1978 to 1989, 4,772 endoscopic cytological examinations of the stomach have been done in our laboratory, including 903 patients with a final diagnosis of gastric carcinoma. There were seven false-positive results among 3,810 examinations done in patients without malignant disease (specificity 99.8%). Cytology yielded positive results in 785 of 903 carcinomas (sensitivity 86.9%), while biopsies were positive in 826 of 895 cases (sensitivity 92.3%). Both techniques combined resulted in positive diagnoses in 886 of 903 malignancies (sensitivity 98.1%). Cytology was positive in 52 patients with negative biopsies as well as in eight patients in whom biopsies had not been obtained. Thus cytology added 60 positive diagnoses (6.7%) to the overall diagnostic results. These results suggest that endoscopic cytology is useful for avoiding unnecessary delays caused by having to perform repeated endoscopic biopsies. It should be done as a routine procedure in those institutions in which significant numbers of gastric carcinomas are studied and where an experienced gastrointestinal cytology laboratory is available.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:issn0192-0790lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VilardellFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OcañaJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CussóXXlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MéndezCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MonésJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:volume16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:pagination336-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8331271-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8331271-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8331271-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8331271-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8331271-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8331271-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8331271-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:articleTitleIs endoscopic gastric cytology worthwhile? An evaluation of 903 cases of carcinoma.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:affiliationGastrointestinal Cytology Laboratory, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8331271pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed