Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1993-8-10
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In societies where there are both multiple influences on smoking cessation and a downward secular cessation trend, the attribution of cessation effects to particular interventions poses challenging evaluation problems. Quit smoking lotteries are gaining popularity as mass-reach smoking cessation strategies. Most published evaluations of the lotteries have reported impressive cessation rates within samples of entrants. However, none has considered the possibility that the lotteries merely concentrate a secular quitting trend around a researched event or whether they increase the cessation rate of the whole community from which entrants derive.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
0091-7435
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
22
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
423-32
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Follow-Up Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Intervention Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-New South Wales,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Prevalence,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Program Evaluation,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Selection Bias,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Smoking,
pubmed-meshheading:8327422-Smoking Cessation
|
pubmed:year |
1993
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Quit and win smoking cessation contests: how should effectiveness be evaluated?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Community Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|