Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1994-3-1
pubmed:abstractText
This study compares several dosing regimens for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the management of acute maxillofacial surgical pain. The dosing methods differed by presence or absence of an active drug (morphine [MS] vs saline), presence of a baseline infusion, and dose of drug delivered. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that lasted 24 hours. The study was completed in two separate parts, each of which involved randomization of patients into four groups (part I) or three groups (part II). No significant differences were noted in pain scores in the preoperative, immediate postoperative, or 4-, 8-, 12-, or 24-hour periods among any of the groups, including the saline-only control groups; in either part I or part II of the study. Significant differences (P < .01), however, were noted in nausea and vomiting scores. Fifty percent (50%) of patients receiving MS vomited, while no patients in the saline groups vomited. This study calls into question the usefulness of PCA with MS in maxillofacial surgery patients. Pain control was questionable at best, and the rate of emesis was unacceptably high in patients with potentially compromised airways. Further research is required to determine if other analgesics provide better pain control with less nausea in the PCA system or if antiemetics can effectively be used to lower the incidence of nausea and vomiting.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0278-2391
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
52
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
155-9; discussion 159-60
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Adolescent, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Analgesia, Patient-Controlled, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Analysis of Variance, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Anesthesia, Dental, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Conscious Sedation, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Double-Blind Method, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Female, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Infusions, Intravenous, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Male, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Morphine, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Nausea, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Pain, Postoperative, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Pain Measurement, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Placebo Effect, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Tooth, Impacted, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Tooth Extraction, pubmed-meshheading:8295050-Vomiting
pubmed:year
1994
pubmed:articleTitle
Patient-controlled analgesia: a comparison of dosing regimens for acute postsurgical pain.
pubmed:affiliation
David Grant US Air Force Medical Center, Travis AFB, CA 94535-1800.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial