Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1993-12-13
pubmed:abstractText
An instrument designed to assess potentially challenging cognitive and social activities in a wide range of both psychiatric and normal study populations is described in this paper. The technique used combines traditional time budget approaches with an additional, significant component, i.e. a rating indicating the amount of challenge for each activity that is sampled. Separate ratings reflecting the subject's and the interviewer's perspective are generated. Along with a detailed description of this weighted time budget instrument, preliminary data regarding practicality, reliability and validity are reported. An analysis based on time budget interviews with 30 schizophrenic patients showed overall interrater agreement to average 84% (kappa = 0.72). In a study with a possible bearing on the concurrent validity of the instrument, relapsing schizophrenics significantly differed from stable subjects in weighted time budget indices.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0933-7954
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
28
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
184-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1993
pubmed:articleTitle
A weighted time budget approach for the assessment of cognitive and social activities.
pubmed:affiliation
Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article