| pubmed-article:8209862 | pubmed:abstractText | To design a rapid and efficient protocol for processing pediatric stool specimens, the authors used 434 specimens to evaluate two commercial latex assays to detect rotavirus (Meritec-Rotavirus and Rotalex) and one to detect adenovirus (Adenolex). Rotavirus latex assay results were compared with electron microscopic examination and adenovirus latex assay results with virus culture. Ninety-two specimens (21%) were positive for rotavirus and 28 (6.5%) for adenovirus; 5 (1%) had both viruses. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values for the three assays were, respectively, as follows: Meritec-Rotavirus (97%, 99%, 97%, 99%), Rotalex (91%, 99%, 94%, 98%), and Adenolex (46%, 99%, 77%, 97%). For primary rotavirus screening, the Meritec-Rotavirus and Rotalex latex assays offer a good alternative to electron microscopic examination. For primary adenovirus screening, the low sensitivity of the Adenolex latex assay precludes its use as a routine screen. Its excellent specificity, however, makes it a useful tool for culture confirmation. | lld:pubmed |
